A dog bite is not a scratch you shrug off. Teeth tear. The wound can infect within hours. A lot of the serious ones land on a child’s face. If that happened to you or someone in your family anywhere in the Kansas City metro, on either side of the state line, a Kansas City dog bite lawyer can help you pursue the medical costs, lost wages, scarring, and other damages the owner’s insurer should be paying.
Kopit Law Firm represents people injured by dogs throughout greater Kansas City, in both Missouri and Kansas.
Before you tell the owner’s insurance company that the dog was usually friendly, talk to Kopit Law Firm. That sentence is often the first thing an adjuster writes down. The claim is usually against a homeowners or renters policy, not against a neighbor with a checkbook, and the person on the phone is building a file.
Founding attorney Michael Kopit handles serious injury claims, including dog bites. He began his career on the other side, defending businesses and insurance companies. He knows how those companies assign value to a file, which facts they look for first, and how quickly they move to provocation, trespass, or “the dog never did this before.” He now puts that knowledge to work for injured people. When you hire this firm, you work with Michael directly, not a case manager you never meet.
Serious dog attacks happen in Kansas City. In 2024, a dog attack in the Marlborough East Area was serious enough that the Jackson County Prosecutor’s Office issued a public alert. Most bites never make the news. They still leave infection, scarring, and a claim against an insurance company that would rather close the file cheap.
If you were injured or someone in your family was, a Kansas City dog bite attorney can:
Dog-bite claims are rarely as simple as they look at the scene. Working with an attorney lets you focus on recovery while someone else builds the file.
The Kansas City metro sits on a state line, and a dog bite is not the same case on both sides of it.
Missouri is a strict-liability state for dog bites. Under Missouri Revised Statutes section 273.036, the owner or possessor of a dog that bites someone, without provocation, while that person is on public property or lawfully on private property — including the owner’s own property — is strictly liable for the resulting damages. The dog’s prior history does not matter. Neither does whether the owner knew the dog might bite.
The statute builds in comparative fault: if the injured person is found partly at fault, the damages are reduced by that share. The usual defenses are provocation and that the injured person was not lawfully on the property, for example by trespassing. The statute covers bites. If a dog knocks someone down or scratches them without biting, the claim generally proceeds under negligence or related common-law theories instead. The statute also says its remedies sit on top of, not in place of, other claims available under Missouri law.
Kansas does not have a matching statewide strict-liability bite statute. A Kansas claim usually proceeds on one or both of two theories. First, if the owner knew or should have known the dog had vicious or dangerous propensities — the idea often called the one-bite rule — the owner can be held responsible for injuries that flow from that propensity. A prior bite is strong evidence of that knowledge, and it is not the only evidence. Threats, attacks on other animals, and similar history can matter too. Second, the owner can be liable in negligence for failing to restrain the dog, keep it fenced, or follow a local leash law, even if the dog had never bitten anyone. Cities and counties across the metro write their own animal-control rules. A leash violation does not automatically win a civil case, but it is often part of the negligence picture.
The same bite can be a different case depending on which side of State Line it happened. Michael Kopit is licensed in both Missouri and Kansas and can tell you which rules apply to the facts you actually have.
Deadlines differ as well. Kansas generally allows two years from the date of injury to file a negligence claim. Missouri generally allows five. Exceptions exist in both states, particularly for minors. Do not apply either figure to your own situation without talking to a lawyer first.
Get medical care first. Dog bites carry a high infection risk, and rabies decisions are time-sensitive. A wound that looks minor on the afternoon of the bite can look very different two days later.
Then protect the claim, if you are able:
Once you are medically stable, call. You should hire a lawyer before you sign anything coming from the owner’s insurance company.
Bite injuries are messy in a way car-wreck injuries often are not. Common harm includes:
Some of this announces itself immediately. Some of it does not. Get evaluated even if you walked away thinking it was minor, both because it protects your health and because a gap between the bite and your first medical visit is the first thing an adjuster will use.
Children are closer to a dog’s mouth. Bites to the face, neck, and hands are common, and a scar that would be a line on an adult arm is a different injury on a seven-year-old’s cheek. When a child is bitten, the claim raises the usual questions about the dog and the owner plus several that only come up with minors: who brings the claim, how future medical care and scarring are valued, and how fear and changed behavior get documented without turning a child into a spectacle.
Kopit Law Firm handles those cases without treating a family like a file number. If your child was bitten in Kansas or Missouri, call for a free consultation. The filing deadlines still apply, and they are not the same in both states. Minors can change the clock. That is a reason to call, not a reason to wait.
When a dog attack is fatal, certain surviving family members may be able to bring a wrongful death claim. Recoverable damages can include medical bills incurred before death, funeral and burial costs, loss of companionship, loss of the income the person would have earned, and the pain and suffering the person experienced before dying.
Who holds the right to file is not the same in both states, and the answer is not always the person you would assume. Missouri sets out a tiered class of eligible claimants; Kansas takes a different approach. A Kansas City dog bite attorney can determine who is entitled to bring the claim before a deadline complicates it further.
The owner or possessor of the dog is the usual defendant. “Possessor” matters. The person who had the dog that day is not always the person on the veterinary file.
Other parties sometimes belong in the claim:
Who pays is usually a homeowners or renters insurer, not the owner out of pocket. That is why the call comes quickly and why a recorded statement is a problem. Some policies exclude certain breeds or animal-liability coverage altogether. When a carrier denies or underpays, that is an insurance dispute as much as it is a bite claim. Policy limits also cap what a settlement can reach, no matter how serious the injury.
Insurers still spend most of their energy on fault. In Missouri they look for provocation and trespass, because those are the holes in the statute. In Kansas they look for a missing history of aggression and for anything that puts the injured person in the dog’s space. Those arguments are worth taking seriously and are frequently overstated.
No two claims settle for the same reason. The factors that carry the most weight include:
If you want a grounded view of where your claim stands, contact Kopit Law Firm. Michael Kopit will review the evidence and the circumstances and give you a straight assessment of the strengths and the problems, including the ones you would rather not hear.
Protect Your Rights Starts With One Call
Call Us: (816) 878-4400
A: No. Missouri abolished the one-bite rule for dog bites in 2009 when it enacted RSMo 273.036. If the other pieces of the statute are met, the owner or possessor is strictly liable even if the dog had never bitten anyone and even if the owner had no reason to think it would. Provocation and trespass still matter. The dog’s reputation does not.
A: Kansas still uses a version of the one-bite idea, plus negligence. If the owner knew or should have known the dog was dangerous, that knowledge can support liability. If the owner failed to restrain the dog or broke a local leash rule, that can support a negligence claim even on a first bite. Which theory fits depends on the facts, including where in the metro the bite happened.
A: In Missouri, a clean history is not a defense to a bite claim under the statute. In Kansas, a first bite is harder, not hopeless. Negligence — an unrestrained dog, a broken fence, a leash-law violation — can still support a claim. Either way, “he’s never done this before” is what owners say. It is not the end of the analysis.
A: Being on the owner’s property does not, by itself, end a Missouri claim. The statute covers people who are lawfully on private property, including the owner’s. Guests, delivery workers, and people who had a right to be there are in a different position from someone who was trespassing. Lawful presence is the question, not the address. Kansas handles the same facts through its negligence and knowledge rules rather than that statute.
A: Often, yes. Most dog-bite claims are paid by a homeowners or renters policy, which is why the insurer, not the owner, is usually the one negotiating. Some policies exclude certain breeds or animal liability altogether, and some owners have no coverage. That is a reason to have a lawyer read the policy, not a reason to assume there is nothing to recover.
A: Kansas generally allows two years from the date of injury. Missouri generally allows five. Exceptions exist, especially for minors. Deadlines also depend on who you would sue. Do not apply either number to your own facts without talking to a lawyer. Waiting until you “see how the scar looks” is how people lose the right to file.
If you or someone in your family was bitten by a dog anywhere in the Kansas City metro, talk to Kopit Law Firm before you talk to the owner’s insurer. Michael Kopit is licensed in Missouri and Kansas, has seen these claims from the defense side, and works with his clients directly. Schedule a free consultation or call (816) 878-4400.
Fields marked with an * are required
Disclaimer: The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. The information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Contacting us through this website does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent using this website. The information you obtain on this website is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. By contrast, it is provided for informational purposes only. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. Kopit Law Firm expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all contents of this website. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is different and depends on its own facts and circumstances.
Copyright © 2026 Kopit Law Firm. All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer |
Site Map |
Privacy Policy |
Site developed by
*Images are obtained under license from Canva and other third-party stock image providers, with attribution included where required.